To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Performance
Immediately after pre-running had occurred, the eye direction research was searched for outliers (research products bigger than step one.five times the new interquartile variety for certain adjustable), of the investigating boxplots. The fresh new rural investigation activities (letter = 19) have been omitted to have personal analysis issues inside vision-recording measures , including 4.22% of your total data.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig 2) (ignoring state anxiety) and you will roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (dealing with getting condition nervousness).
There’s no high dating ranging from LSAS score and you can earliest obsession duration to the system, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 that was plus the situation whenever managing to have condition anxiety using a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Prevention
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations plus indicated that whenever handling getting county stress, you will find zero significant relationship between the LSAS ratings and stay time for you the head roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, one’s body r (27) = -.090, p = .643, in addition to dating sites for Japanese people history roentgen (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
A powerful inverse matchmaking was located ranging from scanpath length and you may LSAS score, roentgen (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever disregarding condition nervousness, and you may stayed when condition stress is controlled to possess r (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step 3).
An effective negative relationship is located anywhere between complete saccade amount and LSAS rating, roentgen (29) = -.511, p = .005 whenever overlooking state stress, and that remained significant an once condition anxiety is controlled getting r (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero matchmaking was discover ranging from imply saccade amplitude and you will LSAS get however, r (29) = -.176, p = .362 even though state nervousness try managed to have roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417
Lascia un commento